ANA · F

Cutter Gauthier

ProbableLATEST DOCUMENTEDGRAPHICS ≠ BUILD
Last confirmed: 2026-09-18
First seen: 2026-09-18
VISIBLE GRAPHIC

Tacks Recharge Pro

CCM

BEHIND
THE
GRAPHICS
→
LIKELY UNDERLYING BUILD

Ribcor Trigger 10 Pro

LOW KICK

Construction is based on documented evidence, independently of the visible graphics.

Graphic cross-check · 2026-10-20: the visible model above matches GearGeek’s player record ↗. This is a graphic-only update. StickDNA’s researched build, specifications, confidence and dates remain unchanged. The stick timeline below retains the original recorded graphics and dates.
STICK DNA

Latest documented spec

Visible graphic
CCM Tacks Recharge Pro
Likely construction
CCM Ribcor Trigger 10 Pro
Build code
Unknown
Kick point
LOW
Flex
80
True curve / mold
P90
Curve family
P92 / Sakic family
Closest retail stick
Unknown
Retail curve match
P92 · Exact
Lie
6.5
Length
Unknown
Shaft
Unknown
Blade
Unknown
Grip
Unknown
First seen
2026-09-18
Last confirmed
2026-09-18
Curve match: Exact canonical P92-family geometry match. CCM P90 normalizes to Bauer P92; the printed manufacturer lie number is not used as a cross-brand geometry measurement.

Explore P90 curve DNA →

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Why we believe it

StickDNA publishes the evidence classification and conclusion while retaining source links, photos and raw research artifacts privately.

other

Matt current stick update — Cutter Gauthier — CCM Ribcor Trigger 10 Pro — 80 flex — P90

Evidence date: 2026-09-18

STICK TIMELINE

What changed — and what we actually know.

Visible graphics and true constructions are tracked separately. A historical graphics change can appear here while the build underneath remains unknown.

LATEST
2026-09-18 → 2026-09-18

CCM Tacks XF Ghost → CCM Ribcor Trigger 10 Pro

LOW kick · 80 flex

Probable
RECENT
2025-09-29 → 2026-09-08

CCM Tacks XF Ghost → Underlying build unknown

Graphics history only — StickDNA has not established the construction underneath.

Unknown
StickDNA rule: A graphics change is a trigger to investigate, not proof of a construction change. Source publication dates and actual on-ice usage dates are tracked separately; a recent article about an older physical stick does not make that stick current.